Seminarium

The Elements of Great Teaching

  • Contributors
  • Curator
  • Mentors
  • Books
    • SemClass

      There are brilliant scholars and there are enthralling teachers. We want to help you merge these qualities. SemClass posts support the student/teacher relationship in ways that bring energy and expertise to both sides of the podium. »

        Trending Topics

      • seminary
      • Bible
      • critical thinking
      • classroom
      • Seminarium Elements

        Most Recent Posts

      • The Last Thesis Proposal Guide Your Students Will Ever Need
      • YOU CAN’T FISH WITHOUT BAIT: Teaching for Sticky Learning — Part 2
      • STICK, STICK, STICK: Teaching for Sticky Learning — Part 1
      • Designing a Student-Centered Learning Environment
      • Before I Take My Classes Online (3 of 3): “So, I’ll Be Able to See All Their Faces, Right?”
    • SemTech

      From LMS to MOOC, the technology of teaching is changing faster than we can keep up. Once confident about our content, we are now being asked to present it in radical new ways. Do you need some support in this? Our SemTech bloggers can help. »

        Trending Topics

      • seminary
      • Bible
      • classroom
      • education
      • richard newton

        Most Recent Posts

      • Pecha Kucha in the Classroom
      • Not Returning Void: Effectively Teaching Homiletics Online
      • Tracking Social Media Footprints in the Online Class
      • Using Wikis Well: Preparation, Implementation, and Engagement (2 of 2)
      • Wikis: A Tool for Fostering Interest and Engagement in Biblical Studies (1 of 2)
    • SemLoci

      Loci is Latin for “localities” or “centers of focus.” It is shorthand for disciplines like comparative religions, theology, hermeneutics and history. We don’t all have the same AOC, and so SemLoci posts will touch on what is unique teaching your discipline. »

        Trending Topics

      • Bible
      • theological education
      • education
      • Teaching
      • Biblical Studies

        Most Recent Posts

      • “I’m Using My Bible for a Roadmap”
      • James 1:27 and the Training of the Modern Nurse
      • Know Your Students, Know Your Story
      • The Bible and Human Transformation—Part III: Miracles and Human Transformation
      • The Bible and Human Transformation—Part II: Jesus’ Parables and Human Transformation
    • SemTrends

      The world of higher academics is in flux. Private, public, and seminary institutions are remaking themselves. Studies about how and why students learn are transforming classrooms. Our SemTrends bloggers will help you stay on top of it. »

        Trending Topics

      • seminary
      • Bible
      • critical thinking
      • classroom
      • richard newton

        Most Recent Posts

      • Teaching Bible with Tech at #AARSBL15
      • Digital Media for Ministry: Mapping the Landscape
      • Seven Things I Wish All Pastors Knew About Academics—Part 2
      • Seven Things I Wish All Pastors Knew About Academics—Part 1
      • Teaching the Bible and Race in the USA
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • YouTube
    • RSS

Posing Questions—Part II: Teaching Curiousity

Posted on October 28, 2013 by David Rhoads

The following excerpts of David’s upcoming book, Teaching to Learn, Learning to Teach: Reflections on Education as Transformation through Dialogue (Summer, 2014), are used by permission of Wipf and Stock Publishers.

Perhaps curiosity is a character trait that cannot be taught. But maybe it can be picked up by example or contagion or osmosis. You see someone who is fascinated with things and loves to investigate them, and you are just drawn to imitate that person.

Reason Enough

That possibility may be reason enough for a teacher to model curiosity and the practice of asking questions. When I was a student, I always wished the lecturers would share the questions that got them into their discipline or that lay behind their ideas. They just gave the statement of the problem, the evidence, and the outcomes, but not the passions that drove them to investigate a problem in the first place. Now, as a teacher, if I want students to ask provocative questions, even questions that challenge my own views, I have to pose provocative questions as well. And I have to show a willingness to be open to challenges of my own views.

Focus on Fascination

When I first started teaching, most of my questions were a cat and mouse game of “Guess what’s in my mind.” I had the answer, and I was trying to get students to come up with the same thing I was thinking. Nobody wins this game. I noted that the students were often frustrated by this, but I did not know what to do—until I read Teaching as a Subversive Activity by Postman and Weingarten.

The authors argue that teachers should never ask a question to which they already had the answer! Of course, this limits the types of question. It may be a factual question of uncertainty to which there were several answers possible. Or it may be a question for which the teacher surely does not have an answer, such as, “What do you (students) think about this?” Or the question might be an opinion question to which the teacher also has an opinion but not an answer. And the teacher should avoid offering their own opinion except as one point of view in a class discussion. I have sought to follow this advice and have found that this approach indeed does focus more on fascination and exploration than on answers. Hence, it tends to engender curiosity.

Can “Safe Questions” and Curiosity Coexist?

At the same time, I am convinced that question-asking is a skill that can be learned. You may need innate or acquired curiosity to make use of this skill. But if you have curiosity, you also need skills to investigate and explore something. Maybe students naturally have questions, and our approach to teaching stifles or discourages them. Even when students have curiosity, the failure to ask questions is, in part, related to fear. This anxiety has to be addressed before students will feel free to exercise their curiosity. After all, “curiosity killed the cat”—so what might it do to a student in a classroom!

If I were a student, I might ask a question and get a response from the teacher that would make me feel like “I thought I would die!” This is understandable. The whole idea of a question is that it exposes our ignorance. We do not know something, and so we ask about it. But what if everyone else already knows the answer? What if the teacher will make it appear foolish that I asked about this? At all costs, as a student, I will not do anything to embarrass myself in front of my fellow students. Perhaps a student has had a bad experience in the past where a teacher ridiculed a question or where students resented you for taking up the class time or for asking a “dumb question.” So, the student is saying: “I’ll be very careful about asking a question. I’ll think it through carefully and be sure it will be a safe question.”

Don’t Skirt the Good Stuff

It has always been strange to me how students will skirt some of the most important questions, because they just do not ask them about the teacher, her views of things, why she thinks this or that, what drives her. Sometimes when I give a guest appearance in another class, those students will be emboldened to ask me a lot about my personal view of things. Maybe it is because I am novel to them or because they will not be graded by me. I do not know. But I wish that students were more proactive in this regard.

It is amazing all that I do not share with a class about myself, my background, my passions, my point of view, because they do not ask. It is also amazing how students who are asking questions out of a great desire to know “what I know” and “what I think about things” are able to draw things out of me—things I did not even know were in there! I wish that the question time were more like that, not only in terms of their questions of me (and their questioning me) but also in terms of my questions of them.

A Return to Hospitality

So, how can we create a hospitable atmosphere in which question-asking is an integral and valued part of the classroom experience for students and teachers alike? Maybe we need to be absolutely clear that we actually, really, honestly do want questions! To try and generate an atmosphere hospitable for questions, I have sometimes said, “You may have had a bad experience in the past asking questions in class. But I want you to know I welcome them. I know you may feel they expose what you do not know. But that is the whole point of learning. I hope we can work together in the learning process for you to clarify to me what I need to explain or explore better. I am depending on that. I am counting on you to ask for clarification and to explore what you are learning. Questions will enable me to teach better and you to learn better.” Then we need to act in such a way as to foster and maintain that atmosphere.

My next post in this series will be on the strategies I’ve developed to avoid things that hinder questions and to do things that foster questions.

FavoriteLoadingAdd to favorites

Filed Under: Mentor Tagged With: answer, asking good questions, classroom, curiousity, david rhoads, fear, hospitality, Posing Questions Series, Postman and Weingarten, provocation, question, safe questions, Teaching as a Subversive Activity

David Rhoads is Emeritus Professor of New Testament at the Lutheran School of Theology at Chicago (1988 to 2010), previously professor of religion at Carthage College, Kenosha, WI (1973 to 1988). He has published Mark as Story (co-author, third edition, 2012), The Challenge of Diversity (2004), Reading Mark, Engaging the Gospel (2005), From Every People and Nation: The Book of Revelation in Intercultural Perspective (editor, 2005), and “Performance Criticism: An Emerging Discipline in Second Testament Studies” (BTB, 2006). He edits the Biblical Performance Criticism series for Wipf and Stock Press. He edited Earth and Word: Classic Sermons on Saving the Planet (2008), co-edited The Season of Creation (2011), and directs Lutherans Restoring Creation. Rhoads was Carthage Teacher of the Year in 1974-75. In 2004, he received the first Fortress Press Award for outstanding teaching in a graduate/seminary institution. Rhoads lives in Racine, WI with his wife the Rev. Sandra Roberts.

About David Rhoads

Related Posts

Learning to Fish: Part 3—Methods for Teaching Methods

Posted on December 23, 2014 by David Rhoads

Just as our scholarly use of new methods can open vistas of interpretation for scholars, my students were awakening to ways of studying the Bible that were wholly new to them. Even more delightful was when students employing a method that had never been applied to the text they were studying. In those cases, they are on the cutting edge of biblical scholarship—not just in doctoral courses but also in college electives and seminary classes, even survey courses….

Continue Reading No Comments

Filed Under: Mentor Tagged With: Bible, critical thinking, david rhoads, form-criticism, historical-critical method, Learning to Fish Series, Linguistic/discourse criticism, method, methodology, Narrative criticism, Orality criticism, Performance Criticism, Reader-response criticism, reading, redaction criticism, Rhetorical analysis, Social science criticism, Source criticism, teaching methodology, Text criticism

Learning to Fish: Part 2—New Questions/New Methods

Posted on December 9, 2014 by David Rhoads

When I taught at seminary, we had a required course that actually focused on method. The course was called “New Testament Interpretation.” It was a methods course that focused on the ways we go about constructing potential meanings of a text in its first century context. Ironically, all the students assumed from the title that we were going to interpret the New Testament for them by telling them what it meant. They were disappointed in the class….

Continue Reading No Comments

Filed Under: Mentor Tagged With: Bible, critical thinking, david rhoads, form-criticism, historical-critical method, Learning to Fish Series, Linguistic/discourse criticism, method, methodology, Narrative criticism, Orality criticism, Performance Criticism, Reader-response criticism, reading, redaction criticism, Rhetorical analysis, Social science criticism, Source criticism, teaching methodology, Text criticism

Learning to Fish: Part 1—Why Methods Matter!

Posted on December 1, 2014 by David Rhoads

This is like the old saw: Give a hungry person a fish and they will get hungry again. Teach them how to fish and they can feed themselves for the rest of their lives. What happens when that analogy is applied to learning? Provide someone with knowledge, and they will not learn how to learn on their own. They will always have to go to an expert to learn. They will be dependent upon the teacher, dependent on secondary sources. However, if you teach students how to learn with a method, they will be able to be independent learners of their own….

Continue Reading No Comments

Filed Under: Mentor Tagged With: Bible, critical thinking, cross-cultural, david rhoads, How to Think Like Leonardo, Learning to Fish Series, method, methodology, reading

Tactical Teaching: Part 3—Different Outcomes/Different Tactics

Posted on June 5, 2014 by David Rhoads

I found that teaching a skill, methods, reflection/action cycles, values, etc. all  involve a very different strategy from imparting information. My book outlines additional tactics, like the skill of translating Greek for instance, but by way of examples, let’s consider…

Continue Reading No Comments

Filed Under: Mentor Tagged With: action, community learning, Context, critical reading, critical thinking, david rhoads, education, Engagement, method, reading, reflection, seminary, skills, strategy, Tactical Teaching Series, tactics, Teaching, theological education, values

Tactical Teaching: Part 2—Four Principles of Interaction

Posted on May 21, 2014 by David Rhoads

College and graduate school teachers have an advanced degree in a specialized field, but they may not have had a course on teaching and only limited opportunities to be teaching assistants. Historically, the assumption of most graduate programs has been that they will teach you the subject matter but it will up to you to learn how to teach it on your own….

Continue Reading No Comments

Filed Under: Mentor Tagged With: community learning, Context, critical thinking, david rhoads, education, Engagement, gamification, gamification in education, lecture, seminary, strategy, Tactical Teaching Series, tactics, Teaching, theological education

Next Page »
  • SemClass
  • SemTech
  • SemLoci
  • SemTrends
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • RSS
  • Contributors
  • Curator
  • Mentors
  • Books

seminarium icon © Copyright 2026 , by David M. Schoenknecht. All rights reserved.

Seminariumblog.org boilerplate text, graphics, and HTML code are protected by US and International Copyright Laws, and may not be copied, reprinted, published, translated, hosted, or otherwise distributed by any means without explicit permission. Blog posts, related images and ancillary content are covered under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Contact Email: admin@seminariumblog.org