Seminarium

The Elements of Great Teaching

  • Contributors
  • Curator
  • Mentors
  • Books
    • SemClass

      There are brilliant scholars and there are enthralling teachers. We want to help you merge these qualities. SemClass posts support the student/teacher relationship in ways that bring energy and expertise to both sides of the podium. »

        Trending Topics

      • seminary
      • Bible
      • critical thinking
      • classroom
      • Seminarium Elements

        Most Recent Posts

      • The Last Thesis Proposal Guide Your Students Will Ever Need
      • YOU CAN’T FISH WITHOUT BAIT: Teaching for Sticky Learning — Part 2
      • STICK, STICK, STICK: Teaching for Sticky Learning — Part 1
      • Designing a Student-Centered Learning Environment
      • Before I Take My Classes Online (3 of 3): “So, I’ll Be Able to See All Their Faces, Right?”
    • SemTech

      From LMS to MOOC, the technology of teaching is changing faster than we can keep up. Once confident about our content, we are now being asked to present it in radical new ways. Do you need some support in this? Our SemTech bloggers can help. »

        Trending Topics

      • seminary
      • Bible
      • classroom
      • education
      • richard newton

        Most Recent Posts

      • Pecha Kucha in the Classroom
      • Not Returning Void: Effectively Teaching Homiletics Online
      • Tracking Social Media Footprints in the Online Class
      • Using Wikis Well: Preparation, Implementation, and Engagement (2 of 2)
      • Wikis: A Tool for Fostering Interest and Engagement in Biblical Studies (1 of 2)
    • SemLoci

      Loci is Latin for “localities” or “centers of focus.” It is shorthand for disciplines like comparative religions, theology, hermeneutics and history. We don’t all have the same AOC, and so SemLoci posts will touch on what is unique teaching your discipline. »

        Trending Topics

      • Bible
      • theological education
      • education
      • Teaching
      • Biblical Studies

        Most Recent Posts

      • “I’m Using My Bible for a Roadmap”
      • James 1:27 and the Training of the Modern Nurse
      • Know Your Students, Know Your Story
      • The Bible and Human Transformation—Part III: Miracles and Human Transformation
      • The Bible and Human Transformation—Part II: Jesus’ Parables and Human Transformation
    • SemTrends

      The world of higher academics is in flux. Private, public, and seminary institutions are remaking themselves. Studies about how and why students learn are transforming classrooms. Our SemTrends bloggers will help you stay on top of it. »

        Trending Topics

      • seminary
      • Bible
      • critical thinking
      • classroom
      • richard newton

        Most Recent Posts

      • Teaching Bible with Tech at #AARSBL15
      • Digital Media for Ministry: Mapping the Landscape
      • Seven Things I Wish All Pastors Knew About Academics—Part 2
      • Seven Things I Wish All Pastors Knew About Academics—Part 1
      • Teaching the Bible and Race in the USA
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • YouTube
    • RSS

Write Along Side of Them

Posted on October 5, 2013 by Philip Ruge-Jones

Two things often slip my mind when teaching a writing intensive research course:

  1. That students refuse to believe that writing is a process and overestimate their ability to pull off a project in the final hour, illness and
  2. That when I’m writing I know the lure of the same delusions.

For the past three years, ed I have address both of these issues. I force myself to engage in the same research process that I assign for my students, doctor doing it right alongside of them.

An Occasion for Composition

In our capstone course, students choose their own topics, formulate a research question, gather research, develop a thesis, and write a final paper. They work through ten assignments that keep them moving toward the final goal, and as they move forward so do I [except when I don’t.]

The steps in the process are taken from the 7th and 8th Edition of Turabian’s A Manual for Writers. During my dissertation, the 6th Edition was a constant guide for getting footnotes and bibliographic materials in proper order. When I saw the 7th Edition as a professor, I was pleased to see that the whole first half of the edition outlines a process designed to address my students’ needs. Rather than repeat their work, I’ll point you to the table of contents to acquaint yourself with the steps of the process.

What’s the Value?

So what is the value of writing along side of my students?

1. While some of the steps are things I automatically work out in my head, forcing myself to write them out slows down my own process and clarifies what I am expecting of the students. Writing reminds me of how much or how little I am demanding of my students during a given assignment period. An added bonus is that doing the process in a written form often yields greater clarity and insight for me as a writer. For example, I slow down to answer explicitly the same question they must: Why would anyone care about this research?

2. My process like theirs goes in fits and starts and missed starts. I find myself frustrated in my writing process just as they do.

In the past, I shared anecdotes to express the predictability of this phenomenon for all writers. However, the students really believe it when rather than chuckling about that month stuck in MarioKart during my dissertation, I instead talk of the seduction that lured me from my writing last night! I am not remembering the frustration of formulating a new concept just out of my reach, I vent that specific frustration in real time.

3. In the midst of a busy teaching load that parallels the busy lives of the students, I often encounter the same stewardship of time issues when they do. Facing it along side of them makes me more compassionate as a teacher and more accountable as a writer.

4. Scholarship too often is a lonely enterprise with long stretches of solitary work. I want my students to work collaboratively with others. By entering into this process and listening to their feedback of my work while also offering with their colleagues feedback for their own writing, we experience in flesh and blood the benefits of joint work.

5. I am able to share with them the specific demands my editor has put on me. Actual style sheets that I am seeking to follow carry more weight than those randomly pulled off the internet.

6. After doing this for three years, I have three sets of sample assignments, each different from the others, that the students can look at when they are trying to understand what is required of them at a particular phase in the process. This year I realized that saving the best student exemplars of the process enriches this treasury even more.

7. The most positive comment on evaluations of my writing intensive courses is appreciation that I was with them throughout the process. They love the shared quest on a journey with so many set backs and revelations. They experienced a sense of professor/student solidarity that is too rare for undergraduates.

8. This process benefits me as a writer and teacher as well. In the midst of a busy teaching load it forces me to work on projects that would otherwise be buried under piles of assessment reports until the summer.

9. As an author in a developing field (Performance Criticism of the Bible, see biblicalperformancecriticism.org), my students alert me to times when my writing assumes too much that my audience may not already know. The students get me to move more slowly, explain myself clearly, and thus write well for a larger audience.

10. The companionship that comes with this process is as much a gift for me as it is for the students. The shared journey with young apprentices in the art of theology helps me to ask new questions and to reach out for help from those whose wisdom might otherwise have been neglected.

A final suggestion.

When I first engaged in this process, I gave myself permission to say to the students, “I am beginning this process with you, but at that point in the semester when I need to be spending more time giving you feedback, I may have to let my own process lie dormant until summer comes. However, for the moment, I am in it with you.”

With each year, I have made it further along in the process with them. This year I made it to my penultimate draft of an article slated for publication next spring.

FavoriteLoadingAdd to favorites

Filed Under: SemClass Tagged With: Biblical Studies, capstone, co-learning, criticism, Performance Criticism, Phillip Ruge-Jones, research papers, writing intensive, writing process

Phil Ruge-Jones is an Associate Professor of Theology at Texas Lutheran University. He has memorized the Gospel of Mark for performance and a digital recording of this called “The Beginning of the Good News” available through Select Multimedia Resources. He regularly teaches students how to internalizing biblical narratives for performance. He is co-editor of the book, The Bible in Ancient and Modern Media, (Cascade, 2009).

About Philip Ruge-Jones

Comments

  1. Brooke Lester says

    October 18, 2013 at 11:38 am

    Thanks, Phil. One reason I often envy my friends who teach creative writing is that it seems easier for them to be “co-writers” with their students, in part because we need our learners to demonstrate something that the pure creative writing learners don’t have to: engagement with a body of discipline-based materials and methods. What your post has me ruminating on is the difference between “Demonstrate engagement with this body of materials & methods with this predetermined product,” and “Demonstrate engagement with this body of materials & methods through this undetermined, collaboratively-discovered-in-real-time process.”

Related Posts

The Last Thesis Proposal Guide Your Students Will Ever Need

Posted on March 3, 2020 by Richard Newton

 Pssss…over here.

Are you thinking about or currently advising a student thesis project? If so, did you give your student a list of what should be included in their thesis proposal?

No student in the history of the world has refused such a list. And even though the list makes advising a whole lot more productive, I bet you can name some profs who have been holding out.

At the request of frustrated students everywhere, I’ve created a little guide for you to revise and share as you deem fit.

Continue Reading No Comments

Filed Under: SemClass Tagged With: academic writing, advising students, mentoring, pedagogy, research paper, research question, richard newton, seminary, thesis proposal, thesis statement, writing center, writing process, Writing with a Point Series

YOU CAN’T FISH WITHOUT BAIT: Teaching for Sticky Learning — Part 2

Posted on March 27, 2015 by Holly Inglis

In the previous blog, we noted two types of bait you might use to hook your students and encourage their memory: Stimulate more of the senses in your classroom and work to help your students connect new information with their prior knowledge. In this blog, we’ll look at the remaining tips for sticky learning and then conclude by noting an example of a successful expedition in sticky teaching….

Continue Reading 2 Comments

Filed Under: Books, SemClass, Seminarium Elements, Sticky Learning Tagged With: Brain Rules, emotional memory, Holly Inglis, John Medina, learning, Seminarium Elements, Sticky Learning, Teaching for Sticky Learning Series

STICK, STICK, STICK: Teaching for Sticky Learning — Part 1

Posted on March 7, 2015 by Holly Inglis

Teaching for sticky learning is primarily a balancing act; balancing the quantity of content with the quality of the learning experience. As we examine each of five “Tips for Sticky Learning” over these two blog posts, try to remember I’m not suggesting you throw out everything you’ve known and practiced in your educational career. Instead, try to imagine tipping the scales just a little bit toward a different kind of learning experience for you as well as your students….

Continue Reading One Comment

Filed Under: Books, SemClass, Seminarium Elements, Sticky Learning Tagged With: CATs, Classroom Assessment Techniques, Holly Inglis, Kathy Dawson, learning, Seminarium Elements, senses, Sticky Learning, Teaching for Sticky Learning Series

Designing a Student-Centered Learning Environment

Posted on February 20, 2015 by Cari Crumly

Designing a student-centered classroom should be built on autonomy. It does not include or involve traditional teaching practices; rather, it is based on collaboration, project- and problem-based learning with integrated technology to allow open discussion, conversation, and debate between students. By examining how to set up the environment for successful practice of student-centered learning, invest in critical ways of appropriating teaching methods and approaches….

Continue Reading No Comments

Filed Under: Books, Pedagogies for Student-Centered Learning, SemClass, Seminarium Elements Tagged With: Cari Crumly, Cari Lyn Crumly, course design, Pamela Dietz, Sarah d'Angelo, Seminarium Elements, Student-Centered Learning

Before I Take My Classes Online (3 of 3): “So, I’ll Be Able to See All Their Faces, Right?”

Posted on February 5, 2015 by A+ Brooke Lester, Curator

girl with groucho glasses in grass

For the face-to-face teacher and learner, entering the online teaching environment is a cross-cultural experience. It’s natural to try to hold on to the familiar, even when aware that this can interfere with a genuinely immersive, transformative experience of an unfamiliar environment. Find your points of discomfort, and ask questions (like those in this blog series) of instructors who already teach online….

Continue Reading No Comments

Filed Under: Books, Curator, SemClass, Seminarium Elements, Understanding Bible by Design Tagged With: Asynchronous, Before I Take My Class Online Series, Blackboard, Brooke Lester, G. Brooke Lester, LMS, online classes, Seminarium Elements, synchronous, Understanding by Design

Next Page »
  • SemClass
  • SemTech
  • SemLoci
  • SemTrends
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • RSS
  • Contributors
  • Curator
  • Mentors
  • Books

seminarium icon © Copyright 2026 , by David M. Schoenknecht. All rights reserved.

Seminariumblog.org boilerplate text, graphics, and HTML code are protected by US and International Copyright Laws, and may not be copied, reprinted, published, translated, hosted, or otherwise distributed by any means without explicit permission. Blog posts, related images and ancillary content are covered under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Contact Email: admin@seminariumblog.org